Geographic Data Science - Lecture II

(New) Spatial Data

Dani Arribas-Bel

“Yesterday”

  • Introduced the (geo-)data revolution

    • What is it?
    • Why now?
  • The need of (geo-)data science to make sense of it all

Today

  • Traditional data: refresher
  • New sources of spatial data
  • Opportunities & Challenges

Good old spatial data

Good old spatial data

[source]

Good old spatial data (+)

Traditionally, datasets used in the (social) sciences are:

  • Collected for the purpose –> carefully designed
  • Detailed in information (“…rich profiles and portraits of the country…”)
  • High quality

Good old spatial data (-)

But also:

  • Massive enterprises ("…every single person…) –> costly
  • But coarse in resolution (to preserve pricacy they need to be aggregated)
  • Slow: the more detailed, the less frequent they are available

Examples

  • Decenial census (and census geographies)
  • Longitudinal surveys
  • Customly collected surveys, interviews, etc.
  • Economic indicators

New sources of (spatial) data

New sources of (spatial) data

Tied into the (geo-)data revolution, new sources are appearing that are:

  • ACCIDENTAL –> created for different purposes but available for analysis as a side effect
  • Very diverse in nature, resolution, and detail but, potentially, much more detailed in both space and time
  • Quality also varies greatly

Different ways to categorise them…

Lazer & Radford (2017)

  • Digital Life: digital actions (Twitter, Facebook, WikiPedia…)
  • Digital traces: record of digital actions (CDRs, metadata…)
  • Digitalised life: nonintrinsically digital life in digital form (Government records, web…)

Arribas-Bel (2014)

Three levels, based on how they originate:

  • [Bottom up] “Citizens as sensors”
  • [Intermediate] Digital businesses/businesses going digital
  • [Top down] Open Government Data

Citizens as sensors

  • Technology has allowed widespread adoption of sensors (bands, smartphones, tablets…)
  • (Almost) every aspect of human life is subject to leave a digital trace that can be collected, stored and analyzed
  • Individuals become content/data creators (sensors, Goodchild, 2007)
  • Why relevant for geographers? –> Most of it (80%?) has some form of spatial dimension

Example: Livehoods

Businesses moving online

  • Many of the elements and parts of bussiness activities have been computerized in the last decades
  • This implies, without any change in the final product or activity per se, a lot more digital data is “available” about their operations
  • In addition, enirely new business activities have been created based on the new technologies (“internet natives”)
  • Much of these data can help researchers better understand how cities work

Example: Walkscore

Open data for open governments

Government institutions release (part of) their internal data in open format. Motivations (Shadbolt, 2010):

  • Transparency and accountability
  • Economic and social value
  • Public service improvement
  • Creation of new industries and jobs

Example: BikeShare Map

Source

Class Quiz

Class Quiz

In pairs, 2 minutes to discuss the origin of the following sources of (geo-)data:

  • Geo-referenced tweets –> Bottom-up
  • Land-registry house transaction values –> Open Government
  • Google maps restaurant listing –> Digital businesses
  • ONS Deprivation Indices –> Traditional (not accidental!)
  • Liverpool bikeshare service station status –> Open Government Data

Opportunities & Challenges

Opportunities

From Lazer & Radford (2017):

  • Massive, passive
  • Nowcasting
  • Data on social systems
  • Natural and field experiments (“always-on” observatory of human behaviour)
  • Making big data small

Challenges

  • Bias
  • Technical barriers to access
  • The need of new methods

Bias

  • Traditional data meet some quality standards (representativity, accuracy…)
  • Because they’re accidental, new data sources might not
  • Researchers need to have extra care and put more thought into what conclusions they can reach from analyses with new sources of data
  • In some cases, bias can run in favour of researchers, but this should never be taken for granted

Technical barriers to access

  • Much of these data are available
  • However, their accidental nature makes them not be directly available
  • Usually, a different set of skills is required to tap into their power

    • Basic programming
    • Computing literacy (understanding of the internet, APIs, databases…)
    • Software savvy-ness (a.k.a. “go beyond Word and Excel”)

(New) Methods

The nature of these data is not exactly the same as that of more traditional datasets. For example:

  • Spatial aggregation: Polygons Vs. Points
  • Temporal aggregation(frequency): Decadal Vs. Real-time

Some of this does not “play well” with techniques employed traditionally to analyze data in Geography –> borrow techniques from other disciplines, or even create new ones

(New) Methods

[source]

New + Old

Traditional data:

  • High quality, detailed, and reliable
  • Costly, coarse, and slow

Accidental data:

  • Cheap, fine-grained, and fast
  • Less reliable, harder to access, and potentially uninteresting

–> 1 + 1 > 2

Creative Commons License
Geographic Data Science’18 by Dani Arribas-Bel is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.