Geographic Data Science - Lecture IX

Causal Inference

Dani Arribas-Bel

Today

  • Correlation Vs Causation
  • Causal inference
  • Why/when causality matters
  • Hurdles to causal inference & strategies to overcome them

Correlation Vs Causation

"Association breeds similarity" (sometimes)
Nasir bin Olu Dara Jones (a.k.a. Nas)

Correlation Vs Causation

Two fundamental ways to look at the relationship between two (or more) variables:

Correlation

Two variables have co-movement. If we know the value of one, we know something about the value of the other one.

Causation

There is a "cause-effect" link between the two and, as a result, they display co-movement.

Correlation Vs Causation

  • Both are useful, but for different purposes

  • Causation implies correlation but not the other way around

  • It is vital to keep this distinction in mind for meaningful and credible analysis

Examples

Sign correlation? Causal link?

Take a guess (2mins)...

  • Temperature and ice-cream consumption  →  Positive. Positive.
  • Non-commercial space launches & Sociology PhDs awarded
  • Crime & policing
  • IMD Moran Plot in Liverpool

[Source]

Examples

Positive or negative correlation? Causal link?

Take a guess (2mins)...

  • Temperature and ice-cream consumption  →  Positive. Positive.
  • Non-commercial space launches & Sociology PhDs awarded  →  Positive. None.
  • Crime & policing  →  Positive. Negative.
  • IMD Moran Plot in Liverpool

Examples

Positive or negative correlation? Causal link?

Take a guess (2mins)...

  • Temperature and ice-cream consumption  →  Positive. Positive.
  • Non-commercial space launches & Sociology PhDs awarded  →  Positive. None.
  • Crime & policing  →  Positive. Negative.
  • IMD Moran Plot in Liverpool  →  Positive. ?

Causal inference

[Source]

Why/When get causal?

Why

  • Most often, we are interested in understanding the processes that generate the world, not only in observing its outcomes
  • Many of these processes are only indirectly observable through outcomes
  • The only way to link both is through causal channels

When

Essentially when the core interest is to find out if something causes something else

  • Policy interventions
  • Medical trials
  • Business decisions (product/feature development...)
  • Empirical (Social) Sciences
  • ...

When not (necessarily)

Exploratory analysis

When you are not sure what you are after, inferring causality might be too high of a price to pay to get a sense of the main relationships

Predictive settings

Interest not in understanding the underlying mechanisms but want to obtain best possible estimates of a variable you do not have by combining others you do have

E.g. Population density in a specific point using population density in all available nearby locations

Hurdles to causal inference

Hurdles to causal inference

Causation implies Correlation

Correlation does not imply Causation

Why?

  • Reverse causality
  • Confounding factors/endogeneity

Reverse causality

There is a causal link between the two variables but it either runs the oposite direction as we think, or runs in both

E.g. Education and income

Confounding factors

Two variables are correlated because they are both determined by other, unobserved, variables (factors) that confound the effect

E.g. Ice cream and cold beverages consumption

Strategies

Is there any way to overcome reverse causality and confounding factors to recover causal effects?

The key is to get an exogenous source of variation

Strategies

Randomized Control Trials

Treated and control groups

Probability of treatment is independent of everything else

Quasi-natural experiments

Like a RCT, but that just "happen to occur naturally" (natural dissasters, exogenous law changes...)

Econometric techniques

For the interested reader: space-time regression, instrumental variables, propensity score matching, differences-in-differences, regression discontinuity...

So, why correlation at all?

Establishing causality is much harder than identifying correlation, and sometimes it is just not possible with a given dataset (e.g. many observational surveys).

... correlation most often precludes causation and, depending on the application/analysis, it is all that is needed.

It is important to always draw conclusions based on analysis, know what the data can and cannot tell, and stay honest.

Recapitulation

  • Correlation does NOT imply causation
  • Causality implies more than correlation, a direct effect channel that is harder to identify but might be worthwhile
  • There are several techniques to identify causality, all usually based on obtaining exogenous sources of variation
  • You don't always need causality

[Source]

Creative Commons License
Geographic Data Science'15 - Lecture 10 by Dani Arribas-Bel is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.